Vrinik works with businesses where security has become a commercial threshold — to the next enterprise contract, the next funding round, the next regulator review. The framework changes with the sector. The discipline does not.
Vrinik’s deepest playbook is in FinTech and payments. The same discipline — practitioner-led, evidence-first, accountable for the outcome — applies across every modern technology business where security has become commercially material.
For licensed payments, BaaS, neo-banks, and Open Banking businesses where security is the licence to operate.
Vrinik builds the controls that banking partners, regulators, and enterprise customers accept as evidence — built inside licensed PSPs, not theorised from the outside.
For technology businesses selling into enterprise and regulated buyers where security has become a commercial gate.
Vrinik builds the SOC 2, ISO 27001, and governance programme that clears procurement, satisfies investors, and supports the next certification.
For digital health, MedTech, and patient-data platforms operating under HIPAA, MDR, and enterprise health-system procurement.
Vrinik aligns security with the certifications and evidence formats hospital systems and health regulators ask for — not generic SaaS readiness.
For insurance, embedded insurance, and broker platforms operating under FCA, IRDAI, and carrier partner scrutiny.
Vrinik bridges FinTech-style controls with insurance-specific evidence — for carrier reviews, regulator scrutiny, and broker partnerships.
For regulatory technology firms whose customers are banks, insurers, and regulated entities with the strictest vendor risk processes.
Vrinik builds for the buyer that runs the most stringent diligence in the market — security that withstands repeat scrutiny by sophisticated counterparties.
For AI-native businesses navigating the new regulatory regime — EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001 — alongside enterprise customer demands.
Vrinik addresses model risk, data leakage, and AI governance — designed for the current regulatory moment, not last year’s.
Across every sector Vrinik works in, three audiences run the same diligence in different ways. Each asks for specific evidence in a specific format. Knowing what each one wants — and how they want it — is most of the work.
A completed security questionnaire, references from similar-sized customers, a current SOC 2 or ISO 27001 report, a recent penetration test summary, incident history, and confirmation that someone with authority owns the security programme. Procurement reads this material — they do not read policy text.
Evidence the documented controls operate as designed — control testing records, exception logs, board oversight minutes, and the audit trail for material decisions. Policies set the standard; the operational record is what gets reviewed.
Certification status, recent penetration test results, incident history, the security organisation chart, and how cyber risk is reported to the board. Team size is one input. Accountability, reporting quality, and decision-making history matter more.
Tell us where the programme stands. The first conversation will establish the likely shape of the problem, where to direct attention first, and whether Vrinik is the right firm for the work.
Request a consultation